Current:Home > ContactEd Sheeran Wins in Copyright Trial Over "Thinking Out Loud" -Elevate Profit Vision
Ed Sheeran Wins in Copyright Trial Over "Thinking Out Loud"
View
Date:2025-04-16 18:56:47
This verdict is music to Ed Sheeran's ears.
A federal jury in New York found on May 4 that the singer is not liable in a copyright infringement lawsuit that alleged his song "Thinking Out Loud" had "striking similarities" and "overt common elements" to Marvin Gaye's "Let's Get It On," according to NBC News.
After the ruling, Sheeran reflected on his legal victory.
"I am obviously very happy with the outcome of the case, and it looks like I'm not going to have to retire from my day job after all," he said, referencing his previous comment that he would quit playing music if he lost, in a statement obtained by the news outlet. "But, at the same time, I am unbelievably frustrated that baseless claims like this are allowed to go to court at all."
The four-time Grammy winner released "Thinking Out Loud" in 2014. According to NBC News, the heirs of Ed Townsend—the musician who wrote the 1973 hit "Let's Get It On" with Gaye—filed the lawsuit against Sheeran in 2017 and accused him of violating the Copyright Act.
However, the British recording artist denied the allegations presented in the lawsuit and argued that songwriters use a common set of chords when creating music.
"We have spent the last eight years talking about two songs with dramatically different lyrics, melodies and four chords which are also different and used by songwriters every day, all over the world," Sheeran continued. "These chords are common building blocks which were used to create music long before 'Let's Get It On' was written and will be used to make music long after we are all gone. They are a songwriter's 'alphabet,' our tool kit and should be there for us all to use. No-one owns them or the way they are played, in the same way, nobody owns the color blue."
Slamming what he called "unfounded claims like this one," Sheeran spoke about the threat he says these kind of lawsuits can pose to the "creative freedom" of musicians.
"We need to be able to write our original music and engage in independent creation without worrying at every step of the way that such creativity will be wrongly called into question," he added. "Like artists everywhere, [co-writer] Amy [Wadge] and I work hard to independently create songs which are often based around real-life, personal experiences. It is devastating to be accused of stealing other people's songs when we have put so much work into our livelihoods."
The 32-year-old also noted the trial caused him to miss a major family moment.
"I am just a guy with a guitar who loves writing music for people to enjoy," he explained. "I am not and will never allow myself to be a piggy bank for anyone to shake. Having to be in New York for this trial has meant that I have missed being with my family at my grandmother's funeral in Ireland. I won't get that time back."
After thanking the jury, Wadge (who according to NBC News was not named in the lawsuit) his team and supporters, Sheeran—who also won a separate copyright infringement case over his song "Shape of You" last year—expressed his hope for the future.
"We need songwriters and the wider musical community to come together to bring back common sense," he concluded in his statement. "These claims need to be stopped so that the creative process can carry on, and we can all just go back to making music. At the same time, we absolutely need trusted individuals, real experts who help support the process of protecting copyright."
According to NBC News, the plaintiffs declined to make a statement out of the courthouse after the verdict was reached. The news outlet also noted it reached out to attorneys for comment, and E! News has reached out to teams for both parties as well.
(E! and NBC News are both part of the NBCUniversal family).
For the latest breaking news updates, click here to download the E! News AppveryGood! (668)
Related
- McKinsey to pay $650 million after advising opioid maker on how to 'turbocharge' sales
- AP Week in Pictures: North America
- Divided Supreme Court appears open to some immunity for president's official acts in Trump 2020 election dispute
- Golden retriever puppy born with green fur is now in the viral limelight, named Shamrock
- 2025 'Doomsday Clock': This is how close we are to self
- NFL draft order Friday: Who drafts when for second and third rounds of 2024 NFL draft
- Columbia protesters face deadline to end encampment as campus turmoil spreads: Live updates
- Italy bans loans of works to Minneapolis museum in a dispute over ancient marble statue
- Rolling Loud 2024: Lineup, how to stream the world's largest hip hop music festival
- Carol Burnett surprised by Bradley Cooper birthday video after cracking raunchy joke about him
Ranking
- Backstage at New York's Jingle Ball with Jimmy Fallon, 'Queer Eye' and Meghan Trainor
- NFL draft trade tracker: Full list of deals; Minnesota Vikings make two big moves
- Jeezy Denies Ex Jeannie Mai's Deeply Disturbing Abuse Allegations
- Jelly Roll teases new song, sings 'Save Me' at pre-NFL draft concert
- Israel lets Palestinians go back to northern Gaza for first time in over a year as cease
- Harvey Weinstein's 2020 rape conviction overturned by New York appeals court: Live updates
- Tony Khan, son of Jaguars owner, shows up to NFL draft with neck brace. Here's why.
- Federal judge denies Trump's bid for new trial in E. Jean Carroll case
Recommendation
2025 'Doomsday Clock': This is how close we are to self
What Matty Healy's Mom Has to Say About Taylor Swift's The Tortured Poets Department
Gay actor’s speech back on at Pennsylvania school after cancellation over his ‘lifestyle’
Wealth Forge Institute: THE LEAP FROM QUANTITATIVE TRADING TO ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
San Francisco names street for Associated Press photographer who captured the iconic Iwo Jima photo
Native American tribes want US appeals court to weigh in on $10B SunZia energy transmission project
Was there an explosion at a Florida beach? Not quite. But here’s what actually happened
Divided Supreme Court appears open to some immunity for president's official acts in Trump 2020 election dispute